Evaluación de criterios para la selección de modelos de mantenimiento a través de Topsis

Martin Pillado Portillo; Rosa María Reyes Martínez; Christian Reyes Córdova; Eduardo Rafael Poblano Ojinaga; Manuel Alejandro Barajas Bustillos

doi:10.61273/neyart.v3i4.113

Authors

Martin Pillado Portillo National Technological Institute of Mexico
Rosa María Reyes Martínez National Technological Institute of Mexico
Christian Reyes Córdova National Technological Institute of Mexico
Eduardo Rafael Poblano Ojinaga National Technological Institute of Mexico
Manuel Alejandro Barajas Bustillos National Technological Institute of Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61273/neyart.v3i4.113

Keywords:

Asset management, Decision making,, Productivity, Industrial maintenance, TOPSIS

Abstract

Efficient industrial maintenance management is a key pillar in ensuring the effective operation of machinery and equipment in production environments. In this context, the strategic selection of the maintenance model to be used becomes a critical challenge, directly affecting the reliability, availability, and overall performance of industrial assets. The main objective is to develop a tool that simplifies and refines the process of selecting the appropriate maintenance model for the processes and machines involved in the selection. The tool will be developed by considering key variables such as equipment costs, recurrence of failures, comparison of expenses related to failures, preventive or predictive interventions, and more. In addition, the models will be validated by analyzing correlations between the model and these factors for different types of machines and equipment in various processes, to strengthen the data accuracy. Using the developed tool, the expected outcomes include a significant reduction in expenses, labor, and materials, as well as a significant increase in maintenance availability and effectiveness (Autonomous, Preventive, Predictive, and Failure-based maintenance). This will demonstrate the substantial impact of proper model selection. Effective management of maintenance model selection through interaction with various factors ensures successful implementation and enables benefits in multiple categories, improving key performance indicators and the reliability of equipment within company operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Martin Pillado Portillo , National Technological Institute of Mexico

Professor at the Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Juárez, specializing in electromechanical engineering and industrial maintenance, with experience in continuous improvement. He holds a Master's in Industrial Engineering and is pursuing a Doctorate in Engineering Sciences. His focus is applied research and solving industrial problems.

Rosa María Reyes Martínez , National Technological Institute of Mexico

Research professor at the Tecnológico Nacional de México, Ciudad Juárez campus, involved in master's and doctoral programs. She holds a Doctorate in Health Sciences in the Workplace and is a reference in engineering and occupational health. She coordinates master's programs and is a member of the doctoral faculty.

Christian Reyes Córdova , National Technological Institute of Mexico

Mechanical engineer with a Master's in Administration and Senior Management and a postgraduate degree in Engineering Sciences with an emphasis on construction. Teaching since 2006 in mechanical and mechatronic engineering, he has held administrative positions at the Instituto Tecnológico de la Laguna. He has served as deputy director of planning and liaison, participating in ethics and equality committees at the state level.

Eduardo Rafael Poblano Ojinaga , National Technological Institute of Mexico

Industrial Engineer from the Tecnológico Nacional de México, IT La Laguna, with a Master's in Industrial Engineering Sciences and Administrative Engineering. Doctor in Technology from the Universidad Autónoma de Cd. Juárez-México. His research focuses on Strategic Planning, Quality Engineering, and SEM. He has experience as a Manufacturing Manager and Consultant in Quality Engineering and Six Sigma.

Manuel Alejandro Barajas Bustillos , National Technological Institute of Mexico

Graduate of the Doctorate in Advanced Engineering Sciences from UACJ, with a Master's in Industrial Engineering and a degree in Electronics Engineering from ITCJ. Candidate for the National System of Researchers, with 10 years of experience in the Maquiladora Industry in Cd. Juárez. He has 4 years of teaching experience at the National Technological Institute of Mexico, Cd. Juárez Campus.

References

Cai, Y.J., & Choi, T.M. (2020). A United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals Perspective for sustainable textile and apparel supply chain management. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 141, 102010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102010

Chakraborty S., & Mandal A. (2018). A Novel TOPSIS based Consensus Technique for Multiattribute Group Decision Making. In 2018 18th International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT)(pp.322-326), IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCIT.2018.8587952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCIT.2018.8587952

Kuo T. (2017). A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(1), 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.052

Lado, A.K. & Singh, V.V. (2019). Cost assessment of complex repairable system consisting two subsystems in series configuration using Gumbel Hougaard family copula. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 36(10), 1683-1698, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-12-2018-0322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-12-2018-0322

Liang, R., Zhang, J., Wu, C., & Sheng, Z. (2019). Joint-venture contractor selection using competitive and collaborative criteria with uncertainty. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001588

Liang, Z., & Parlikad, A.K. (2020). Predictive group maintenance for multi-system multi-component networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106704

Muñoz, Y., Castillo, I., & Zuno, J. (2024). Método de Investigación Cuantitativo. Ingenio y Conciencia Boletín Científico de la Escuela Superior Ciudad Sahagún, 11, 174-175. https://doi.org/10.29057/escs.v11i22.12573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29057/escs.v11i22.12573

Piya, S., Shamsuzzoha, A., Khadem, M., & Al-Hinai, N. (2020). Identification of critical factors and their inter-relationships to design agile supply chain: special focus to oil and gas industries. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21(3), 263-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-020-00247-5

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA214804

Upkeep. (n.d.). Planned maintenance percentage (PMP), explained. Upkeep. https://www.upkeep.com/learning/planned-maintenance-percentage/ (accessed 2022).

Yazdi, A.K., Komijan, A.R., Wanke, P.F., & Sardar, S. (2020). Oil project selection in Iran: a hybrid MADM approach in an uncertain environment. Applied Soft Computing, 88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106066

Zhang, W., Yang, D., & Wang, H. (2019). Data-driven methods for predictive maintenance of industrial equipment: a survey. IEEE Systems Journal, 13(3), 2213-2227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2019.2905565