Evaluation of stereolithographic printing for plastic spare parts in industrial machinery and equipment as an alternative, in addition to traditional methods, using mechanical tests
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61273/neyart.v3i5.136Keywords:
Stereolithography, Mechanical Testing, Printing, Cpk, ASTM Standards, PlasticsAbstract
This research evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of using stereolithography 3D printing for the manufacturing of industrial spare parts. Mechanical properties were analyzed such as tensile strength, impact resistance, flexural modulus, compression strength, softening temperature, along with dimensional capability, Tests were conucted following the corresponding ASTM standards, and the results were compared with traditional plastic standards. The average values obtained for mechanical properties were equal to or higher than the standards in some cases. Capability studies showed Cp and Cpk values greater than 1.33 for width and length dimensions, and greater than 1 for height, demonstrating the process's ability to produce dimensionally accurate parts with adequate mechanical properties. These findings validate stereolithography as a viable alternative for industrial replacement applications.
Downloads
Metrics
References
ASTM International. (2017). ASTM D1525-17: Standard Test Method for Vicat Softening Temperature of Plastics. ASTM International.
ASTM International. (2017). ASTM D790-17: Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. ASTM International.
ASTM International. (2018). Standard Test Methods for Evaluating Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. ASTM International.
ASTM International. (2022). ASTM D638-22: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. ASTM International.
ASTM International. (2023). ASTM D256-23: Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics. ASTM International.
ASTM International. (2023). ASTM D695-23: Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics. ASTM International.
Creality. (2024). Halot Box (Versión 3.5.6) [Software].
Dassault Systèmes. (2024). SolidWorks (versión 2024). Dassault Systèmes.
Garmulewicz, A., Holweg, M., Veldhuis, H., & Yang, A. (2020). Disruptive technology as an enabler of the circular economy: What potential does 3D printing hold? California Management Review, 62(3), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620915888
Holmström, J., & Partanen, J. (2021). Digital manufacturing-driven transformations of service supply chains for complex products. Supply Chain Management, 26(4), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2020-0356
ISO (Organización Internacional de Normalización). (1989). ISO 2768-1:1989: Tolerancias generales para dimensiones lineales y angulares sin indicaciones de tolerancia individuales. Organización Internacional de Normalización (ISO).
ISO (Organización Internacional de Normalización). (2017). ISO 22514-2:2017: Métodos estadísticos en la gestión de procesos — Capacidad y rendimiento — Parte 2: Capacidad y rendimiento de procesos dependientes del tiempo. Organización Internacional de Normalización (ISO).
Jarzemskis A. (2025). Fundamentals of global business. Litibero publishing.
Jaržemskis, A. (2007). Research on public logistics centre as tool for cooperation. Transport, 22(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2007.9638096
Li, X., & Chen, Z. (2022). Mechanical behavior and performance optimization of photopolymer composites in stereolithography 3D printing. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 75, 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.02.013
MatWeb. (n.d). Overview of Materials. matweb.com. https://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=29340c5df4bf4de0a511419ce86db27b&ckck=1
Minitab, Inc. (2019). Minitab (versión 19.0). Minitab, Inc.
Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, P. B. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill.
Sapio Research. (2023, julio). Value of reliability. ABB survey report https://new.abb.com/docs/librariesprovider19/default-document-library/abb_survey-report-2023.pdf
Tuck, C., Hague, R., & Reeves, P. (2023). The role of additive manufacturing in supply chain resilience and flexibility. International Journal of Production Research, 61(7), 2143–2158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2175283
Zhang, Y., Xu, X., & Luo, Z. (2024). Advances in composite resin formulations for stereolithography-based 3D printing. Additive Manufacturing Letters, (8), 101-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addlet.2024.101132
Zhao, J., Li, P., & Wu, D. (2023). Optimization of stereolithography printing parameters using machine learning and mechanical testing correlation. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 29(2), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-08-2022-0192
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Raúl Rubio Salazar , Lydia Aldape Rivera , Diego De Jesús Pineda Rosales , Josué De Jesús Campos Oyervides , Mara Dennise Salcido Celada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
