Procedure for applying and monitoring CTQ with QFD

Authors

  • Uriel Noe Marrón Hernández National Technological Institute of Mexico image/svg+xml
  • Manuel Horacio Gutiérrez Martínez National Technological Institute of Mexico image/svg+xml
  • Enrique de Jesús Mohedano Torres National Technological Institute of Mexico image/svg+xml
  • Íngrid Dánae García Morales National Technological Institute of Mexico image/svg+xml
  • Helen Denisse Rojas Castell National Technological Institute of Mexico image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61273/neyart.v4i2.157

Keywords:

QFD, CTQ’s, methodology, continuous improvement

Abstract

Currently, the oil industry has remained an essential pillar of the Mexican economy, contributing millions of pesos to the GDP year after year. As a result, there arises a need to prioritize customer needs even more as a main activity in order to maintain that growth, since it is a fundamental economic support in the country.

The purpose of this research is to propose a methodological integration of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and Critical to Quality (CTQ’s) in this sector, unlike other contexts and industries where these tools have proven to be essential for translating the Voice of the Customer (VoC) and improving the quality of processes.

In response to this absence, this research, using a quantitative and cross-sectional approach, analyzes the recurring problems that primarily generate costs through statistical analysis, in order to evaluate behavior and reduce these failures. The study confirms that applying these two tools allows for a more precise and easier understanding of their underlying causes.

In conclusion, the proposed methodology is effective in reducing variability, strengthening continuous improvement, and can be applied in similar industrial contexts, especially in those developing future projects aimed at improving processes through quality tools or ensuring the consistency of results, as previously mentioned in continuous improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abonyi, J., & Czvetkó, T. (2022). Hypergraph and network flow-based quality function deployment. Heliyon, 8(12), e12263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12263

Arcidiacono, G., Risaliti, E., & Del Pero, F. (2024). Design for Six Sigma in the product development process under a sustainability point of view: A real-life case study. Sustainability, 16(23), 10387. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310387

Burgos-Arcos, C. L., Viñan-Guerrero, P. A., Rivera-Velásquez, M. F., Romero-Villacrés, M. F., & Gualli-Bonilla, D. A. (2021). El despliegue de la función de calidad como herramienta para el diseño de productos: Cuy Andino, como caso de estudio. KAIRÓS, Revista de Ciencias Económicas, Jurídicas y Administrativas, 4(6), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.37135/kai.03.06.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37135/kai.03.06.04

Cruz-Rivero, L., Meráz-Rivera, J., & Lince-Olguín, E. (2023). El despliegue de la función de la calidad y la teoría para la solución de problemas de inventiva: Un análisis de aproximación para la satisfacción de los requerimientos del cliente. Ingeniería Industrial, (45), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.26439/ing.ind2023.n45.6595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26439/ing.ind2023.n45.6595

Erdil, N. O., & Arani, O. M. (2018). Quality function deployment: More than a design tool. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 10(3), 263-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2017-0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2017-0008

Fargnoli, M., & Haber, N. (2023). A QFD-based approach for the development of smart product-service systems. Engineering Reports, 5(11), e12665. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12665 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12665

Frizziero, L., Francia, D., Donnici, G., Liverani, A., & Caligiana, G. (2018). Sustainable design of open molds with QFD and TRIZ combination. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 35(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2017.1385543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2017.1385543

García-Orozco, S., Vargas-Gutiérrez, G., Ordóñez-Sánchez, S., & Silva, R. (2023). Using multi-criteria decision making in quality function deployment for offshore renewable energies. Energies, 16(18), 6533. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16186533

Guerrero González, M. L., Cruz Rivero, L., Mendo Ostos, L., & Vázquez Estrada, O. W. (2025). VoC y QFD como herramientas de integración para el diseño de un prototipo de monitoreo de estructuras de concreto. Ciencia y Reflexión, 4(3), 1495-1516. https://doi.org/10.70747/cr.v4i3.483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70747/cr.v4i3.483

Gutiérrez-García, A. (2019). La gestión de la calidad mediante métodos científicos. Revista de Educación Técnica, 3(7), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.35429/JOTE.2019.7.3.19.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35429/JOTE.2019.7.3.19.26

Herrera, J. F. P. (2020, 5 de noviembre). Despliegue de la función calidad (QFD): Guía de uso. Para qué sirve el QFD y cómo realizarlo. Lean Construction Mexico. https://www.leanconstructionmexico.com.mx/post/despliegue-de-la-función-calidad-qfd-guía-de-uso-para-qué-sirve-el-qfd-y-cómo-realizarlo

Herrera De la Barrera, J., & Narváez Zúñiga, C. (2017). Metodología para la comprensión de la voz del cliente en entornos dinámicos utilizando el despliegue de funciones de calidad (QFD). Teknos Revista Científica, 17(2), 63-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25044/25392190.906

Jiménez Rodríguez, R., Macías Socarrás, I., & Núñez, P. (2020). Aplicación del QFD a productos de una fábrica de conservas. Espacios, 41(44), 225-239.

Mao, L.-X., Lan, J., Chen, A., Shi, H., & Liu, H.-C. (2023). New approach for quality function deployment based on linguistic distribution assessments and CRITIC method. Computers & Industrial Engineering, (178), 109121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109121

Martineau, S. C. Y. (2015). Process improvement in aviation maintenance MRO utilizing Lean Six Sigma methodology [Tesis doctoral]. Northcentral University.

Mestanza Barragán, D. F., & Rojas Párraga, T. C. (2022). Aplicación de herramientas de la metodología Six Sigma para la disminución de la variabilidad del proceso de anodizado de perfiles de aluminio en la empresa CEDAL DURÁN S.A. [Tesis de pregrado, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana].

Olaya Escobar, É., Cortés Rodríguez, C., & Duarte Velasco, O. G. (2005). Despliegue de la función calidad (QFD): Beneficios y limitaciones detectados en su aplicación al diseño de prótesis mioeléctrica de mano. Ingeniería e Investigación, 25(3), 78-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v25n2.14630

Pedroso de Sales, J., da Motta Reis, J. S., Medeiros de Barros, J. G., da Fonseca, B. B., de Araujo Junior, A. H., de Almeida, M. G., Barbosa, L. C. F. M., Santos, G., & Sampaio, N. A. S. (2022). Quality management in the contours of continuous product improvement. International Journal for Quality Research, 16(3), 689-702. https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR16.03-02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR16.03-02

Quintero Osorio, S. (2024). Diseño de estrategia metodológica que permita la aplicación de la matriz QFD (Quality function deployment), en el desarrollo de productos para la empresa Locería Colombiana S.A.S. [Trabajo de grado, Universidad de Antioquia]. Repositorio Digital Universidad de Antioquia. https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/entities/publication/23c5327b-8f22-4030-8ef7-30035e86345c

Rodríguez-Mera, M. A., Guerrero-Moreno, D., García-Jimenez, J. C., & Peña-Montoya, C. C. (2023). Aplicación de Lean Six Sigma para la mejora del proceso de trabajos de grado en una Institución de Educación Superior. Scientia et Technica, 28(02), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.22517/23447214.24773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22517/23447214.24773

Shi, H., Mao, L.-X., Li, K., Wang, X.-H., & Liu, H.-C. (2022). Engineering characteristics prioritization in quality function deployment using an improved ORESTE method with double hierarchy hesitant linguistic information. Sustainability, 14(15), 9771. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159771

SPC Consulting Group. (s.f.). Quality function deployment: La voz del cliente traducido a la voz del ingeniero. SPC Consulting Group. https://spcgroup.com.mx/quality-function-deployment-la-voz-del-cliente-traducido-a-la-voz-del-ingeniero/

The Lean Six Sigma Company. (s.f.). Claves para entender los CTQ en Lean Six Sigma. The Lean Six Sigma Company https://theleancompany.es/claves-para-entender-los-ctq-en-lean-six-sigma/

Viscarra Alarcón, P. C., Vilcacundo Chamorro, E. M., Castro Berio, F. A., & Vallejo Ballesteros, H. F. (2023). Quality function deployment: Definition, benefits and disadvantages in its application for customer satisfaction management. Critical analysis by data mining. Remittances Review, 8(4), 1269-1290. https://doi.org/10.33182/rr.v8i4.89

Wang, J., Liu, H.-C., Shi, H., Guo, W., & Zhu, J.-Y. (2023). New approach for quality function development based on cooperative game-based consensus mechanism and three-way decision method. Information Sciences, (644), 119285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4611985

Xu, X.-G., Zhang, L., Mao, L.-X., & Li, K. (2022). New approach for quality function deployment using an extended CoCoSo method with spherical fuzzy sets. Systems, 10(6), 253. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10060253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10060253

Zhou, J., Zhai, L., & Pantelous, A. A. (2020). Market segmentation using high-dimensional sparse consumers data. Expert Systems with Applications, (145), 113136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113136

Published

2026-03-16

Crossmark

Crossmark Policy Page

How to Cite

Marrón Hernández , U. N., Gutiérrez Martínez , M. H., Mohedano Torres , E. de J., García Morales , Íngrid D., & Rojas Castell , H. D. (2026). Procedure for applying and monitoring CTQ with QFD. Revista NeyArt, 4(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.61273/neyart.v4i2.157

Issue

Section

Innovación Tecnológica Aplicada (ITA)