Design of a teacher training course on the implementation of ChatGPT in higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61273/neyart.v2i3.59Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, higher education, teacher trainingAbstract
Given the accelerated growth of users of the ChatGPT tool, and its high potential for being used irresponsibly and dishonestly among higher education students, the present work consisted of designing a teacher training course on the use of ChatGPT in higher education, based on the results of an opinion survey on the use of ChatGPT in higher education, applied to all teachers of the Department of Systems and Computing of the Instituto Tecnológico de Tláhuac.
The survey results have a Cronbach's Alpha value of .913, which shows that the answers have a high reliability.
The descriptive statistical analysis of the survey responses showed that the aspect about the use of ChatGPT in higher education with which the teachers surveyed agreed the most was the concern about the irresponsible use that students can make of ChatGPT for their learning process with a mean of 5.19 points in items with a 7-grade Likert scale. It also showed that 44% of the respondents had not used ChatGPT and through a chi-square test of independence, a p-value of .033 was obtained, indicating that the level of prior knowledge about ChatGPT has a statistically significant relationship with the age range of the teachers surveyed, which is a relationship that is worth studying more extensively among higher education teachers.
Based on the above, the course designed is an introduction to the use of ChatGPT and a training with emphasis on preventing the irresponsible use of this technology, which will help mitigate the problem that initially motivated the present research work.
Downloads
Metrics
References
AnalysfSoft. (s.f.). StatPlus:mac LE. Recuperado el octubre de 2023, de analystsoft.com: https://www.analystsoft.com/es/products/statplusmacle/
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (27 de enero de 2023). SSRN. Recuperado el julio de 2023, de Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4337484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484
CONAHCyT. (2020). Programa Institucional del Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencia. Recuperado el julio de 2023, de Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencia y Tecnología: https://conahcyt.mx/wp-content/uploads/conacyt/Programa_Institucional_Conacyt_2020-2024.pdf
Cupani, M., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Korzeniowski, C., & Azpilicueta, A. (2019). Elaboración de la versión breve del Cuestionario de Personalidad IPIP-Revisado: Control del sesgo de aquiescencia. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 22(1), 248-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2019.22.1.12
Dagnino, J. (2014). Análisis de varianza. Revista chilena de anestesia, 43(4), 306-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25237/revchilanestv43n02.12
Garcia-Pevalvo, F. (febrero de 2023). The perception of Artificial Intelligence in educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: Disruption or Panic? Education in the Knowledge Society, 24, 1-9.
Gobierno de México. (2019). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2019-2024. Recuperado el junio de 2023, de Gobierno de México: https://framework-gb.cdn.gob.mx/landing/documentos/PND.pdf
Gutierrez Ortiz, A. (2022). Componente de mapas de calor según datos del censo de población. Facultad de Ciencias y Tecnologías Computacionales. La Habana: Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas.
Instituto Tecnológico de Tláhuac. (2019). Programa de Desarrollo Institucional 2019-2024. Recuperado el junio de 2023, de Instituto Tecnológico de Tláhuac: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HC9v_o-YuDIAahBtpSmXiLG3WAjxl-FI/view
Kasneci, E. e. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Mendivelso, F., & Rodriguez, M. (2018). Prueba Chi-cuadrado de independencia aplicada a tablas 2xN. Revista Médica Sanitas, 21(2), 92-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26852/01234250.6
Pegoraro, A., Kumari, K., Fereidooni, H., & Sadeghi, A.-R. (2023). To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question! Recuperado el abril de 2023, de Arxiv Cornell University: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.01487.pdf
Reuters. (2 de febrero de 2023). ChatGPT bate el récord de crecimiento más rápido de usuarios en la historia. Recuperado el abril de 2023, de Forbes: https://www.forbes.com.mx/chatgpt-bate-el-record-de-crecimiento-mas-rapido-de-usuarios-en-la-historia/
Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2014). Design, evaluation, anD analysis of Questionnaires for survey research. Barcelona, España: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118634646
Secretaría de Educación Pública. (2020). Programa Sectorial de Educación 2020-2024. Recuperado el julio de 2023, de Secretaría de Educación Pública: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/562380/Programa_Sectorial_de_Educaci_n_2020-2024.pdf
Simons, H. (2011). El estudio de caso: teoría y práctica. Madrid, España: Ediciones Morata S.L.
Soler Cardenas, S., & Soler Pons, L. (2012). Usos del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach en el análisis de instrumentos escritos. Revista Médica Electrónica, 34(1), 01-06. Recuperado el 11 de 2023, de Revista Médica Electrónica: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=s1684-18242012000100001&script=sci_arttext
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Agyemang Adarkwah, M., Bozkurt, A., Hicjey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(15). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jorge Alberto Olayo-Valles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
