El uso de herramientas case de BI para la toma de decisiones estratégicas en las instituciones de educación superior de Sinaloa

Authors

  • Alfonso Miguel Uriarte Gálvez National Technological Institute of Mexico image/svg+xml
  • Ramón Valenzuela Edeza National Technological Institute of Mexico image/svg+xml
  • Mariano de Jesús Avilés Torres National Technological Institute of Mexico image/svg+xml
  • José Torres Medina National Technological Institute of Mexico image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61273/neyart.v4i3.174

Keywords:

BI, Business Intelligence, CASE tools, decision-making, higher education, Sinaloa, TecNM

Abstract

This article analyzes the use of CASE tools applied to Business Intelligence (BI) as support for strategic decision-making in higher education institutions in the state of Sinaloa, taking the National Technological Institute of Mexico (TecNM) as a case study. Through a comparative and recommendation-based approach, various CASE tools oriented toward BI process management are examined, including Power BI, Pentaho, Talend, and Oracle Data Integrator, with the aim of determining their relevance and efficiency in academic environments. The research was conducted under a quantitative-descriptive approach, using information from TecNM’s statistical records between 2019 and 2025. A methodological model based on the stages of the BI process (extraction, transformation, loading, modeling, and visualization) was implemented to evaluate the performance of the tools in each phase. The results show that Power BI and Pentaho offer greater adaptability for public educational institutions due to their ease of implementation, technical support, and compatibility with different data sources. Likewise, opportunities were identified in the automation of the ETL flow through Talend and in scalability with Oracle Data Integrator. The study concludes that the integration of CASE tools into institutional BI systems contributes to the consolidation of a culture of evidence-based decision-making, improving administrative efficiency, transparency, and the analytical capacity of higher education institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Arias, F., & Torres, L. (2021). Aplicación de sistemas de inteligencia de negocios en universidades públicas latinoamericanas: Retos y oportunidades. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 17(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2021.17.2.45

Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. En J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics: From research to practice (pp. 61–75). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4

Daniel, B. (2015). Big data and analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 904–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12230

Eckerson, W. W. (2011). Performance dashboards: Measuring, monitoring, and managing your business (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5–6), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816

Few, S. (2013). Information dashboard design: Displaying data for at-a-glance monitoring (2nd ed.). Analytics Press.

García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Conde, M. Á. (2019). Big data y analítica educativa: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. RIED: Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(2), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.2.23412

Kimball, R., & Ross, M. (2013). The data warehouse toolkit: The definitive guide to dimensional modeling (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Picciano, A. G. (2012). The evolution of big data and learning analytics in American higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(3), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v16i3.267

Power, D. J. (2014). Decision support, analytics, and business intelligence (2nd ed.). Business Expert Press.

Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(3), e1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1355

Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30–40.

Turban, E., Sharda, R., Delen, D., & King, D. (2020). Business intelligence: A managerial approach (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Watson, H. J., & Wixom, B. H. (2007). The current state of business intelligence. Computer, 40(9), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.331

Yigitbasioglu, O. M., & Velcu, O. (2012). A review of dashboards in performance management: Implications for design and research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2011.08.002.

Published

2026-04-13

Crossmark

Crossmark Policy Page

How to Cite

Uriarte Gálvez , A. M., Valenzuela Edeza , R., Avilés Torres , M. de J., & Torres Medina , J. (2026). El uso de herramientas case de BI para la toma de decisiones estratégicas en las instituciones de educación superior de Sinaloa. Revista NeyArt, 4(3), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.61273/neyart.v4i3.174

Issue

Section

Innovación Tecnológica Aplicada (ITA)